char
treated as signed
or nonnegative
integersThis issue has been automatically converted from the original issue lists and some formatting may not have been preserved.
Authors: Clive Feather, WG14
Date: 1993-12-03
Submitted against: C90
Status: Closed
Converted from: dr.htm, dr_068.html
Item 5 - handling of char
values
Values of the type char
must be treated as either “signed” or “nonnegative”
integers (subclause 6.1.2.5).
a. Is the treatment determined strictly by the value of the expression CHAR_MAX == SCHAR_MAX
?
b. If the treatment is as “signed” integers, does the type char
behave in
every instance as the type signed char
(though of course being a different
type)? If not, what are the differences?
c. If the treatment is as “nonnegative” integers, does the type char
behave in
every instance as the type unsigned char
(though of course being a different
type)? If not, what are the differences? In particular, do the "no overflow,
reduce modulo" semantics apply?
Comment from WG14 on 1997-09-23:
a) Yes.
b) and c) Yes. Subclause 6.2.1.1, “As discussed earlier, ...” indicates that this is the intent.