From walter@bytecraft.com  Thu Feb 26 20:44:50 2004
Received: from smtp3b.sentex.ca (smtp3b.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id i1QJih1S079064
	for <embedded-c@dkuug.dk>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:44:47 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from walter@bytecraft.com)
Received: from granite.sentex.ca (ns.sentex.ca [199.212.134.1])
	by smtp3b.sentex.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1QJib3Z071754;
	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:44:37 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from walter@bytecraft.com)
Received: from bytecraft.com (p122ka.xDSL-1mm.sentex.ca [64.7.151.123])
	by granite.sentex.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1QJirfp072690;
	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:45:00 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from walter@bytecraft.com)
Message-ID: <403E4B2B.B104598@bytecraft.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:38:19 -0500
From: Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Doug Gwyn (CISD)" <gwyn@arl.army.mil>
CC: Willem Wakker <willemw@ace.nl>, Embedded-C <embedded-c@dkuug.dk>
Subject: Re: (embedded-c.191)   TR 18037
References: <200402261936.i1QJa0Xf078873@dkuug.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0 () 

I am in favor of changing the function name. There was a reason why we changed the suffix and an unambiguous function name is easier to check and has less impact on implementations.

w..


"Doug Gwyn (CISD)" wrote:
> 
> The function names could be changed back to *q while the constant suffix
> could be left as *k.