From owner-sc22wg14+sc22wg14-domo2=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Nov 17 23:49:35 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg14-domo2 Delivered-To: sc22wg14-domo2@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 6C6593566AB; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:49:35 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg14@open-std.org Received: from cirrus.dmk.com (cirrus.dmk.com [98.129.238.129]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A5B3566A8 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:49:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.27.19.201] (mobile-166-176-57-86.mycingular.net [166.176.57.86]) (authenticated bits=0) by cirrus.dmk.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 0AHMnU4D016660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:49:31 -0800 (envelope-from dmk@dmk.com) Subject: Re: (SC22WG14.18574) Status of N2529 and N2530 To: Joseph Myers , sc22wg14@open-std.org References: <20201117224241.6C1333588A5@www.open-std.org> From: David Keaton Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:49:30 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201117224241.6C1333588A5@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg14@open-std.org Precedence: bulk The author asked me not to put those on the agenda. He will supply updated versions later. David On 11/17/20 2:42 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > I can't find any sign of N2529 (New pointer-proof keyword to determine > array length) or N2530 (Allow compound literals of static lifetime inside > body functions) having been discussed at, or even made it onto the agenda > of, a meeting yet (they don't even seem to have appeared in "will be > deferred to the next meeting unless there is time available at this > meeting"). Is there some reason these haven't yet been discussed (e.g. > waiting for the proposer to be available during a meeting, or similar)? >