From Miles.Ellis@etrc.ox.ac.uk Wed Dec 20 12:34:21 1995 Received: from oxmail3.ox.ac.uk (oxmail3.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.9]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA21924 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 12:34:11 +0100 Received: from vax.ox.ac.uk (actually host vax) by oxmail3 with SMTP (PP); Wed, 20 Dec 1995 11:32:20 +0000 Received: from 163.1.85.1 by vax.ox.ac.uk (MX V4.1 VAX) with SMTP; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 11:32:15 +0000 X-Sender: MELLIS@vax.ox.ac.uk Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 11:34:42 +0000 To: sc22wg5 From: Miles.Ellis@etrc.ox.ac.uk (Miles Ellis) Subject: N1168 - Informal Letter Ballot on WG5 N1166 ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1168 Informal Letter Ballot on WG5 N1166 WG5 document N1166 is the proposed Draft International Standard for Fortran (DIS 1539-1). Earlier this year the Committee Draft was circulated for an SC22 ballot, in which all countries who submitted votes, other than the US, voted YES, although France, Germany, Japan and the UK supplied comments with their YES votes. The reasons for the US NO vote, together with a substantial number of less critical US comments and the comments which accompanied YES votes, are accumulated in N1135. During its meeting in San Diego WG5 reviewed all these comments and agreed on the action to be taken in all bar a handful of cases, which it delegated to X3J3 to resolve at its meeting the following week. Document N1153 details all the edits agreed by WG5. Note that as a result of WG5's decisions all the reasons for the US NO vote were satisfactorily resolved. Following the X3J3 meeting, which reviewed the WG5 decisions and also resolved the handful of issues left unresolved by WG5, the Editor, Richard Maine produced a new document incorporating all the approved edits. Document N1167 details what these edits are, and N1166 is the proposed DIS 1539-1. Before submitting the draft DIS to ISO for final processing, including the formal DIS ballot at the JTC1 level, it is appropriate for WG5 to review the document to confirm that the editor has correctly incorporated all the approved edits. Please review the document and respond by 31st January 1996 to the following question: Does WG5 N1166 accurately reflect the decisions made by WG5 in its response to the comments received during the CD approval ballot on CD 1539-1? ------ YES | | ------ NO | | If NO, please supply details of what has been done ------ incorrectly. (signed) ................................................... Please send your reply to the Convenor no later than 31st January 1996, preferably by email to , or by fax to +44 1865 270527, or by post. From: Dr Miles Ellis Director: Educational Technology Resources Centre University of Oxford, 37-41 Wellington Square Oxford OX1 2JF, ENGLAND Tel: +44 1865 270528 Fax: +44 1865 270527 Email: Miles.Ellis@etrc.ox.ac.uk WWW: http://www.etrc.ox.ac.uk/Personal/Miles_Ellis.html