From Miles.Ellis@Educational-Technology-Resources-Centre.oxford.ac.uk Wed Oct 4 18:16:07 1995 Received: from oxmail2.ox.ac.uk (oxmail2.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.1]) by dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA03633 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 18:15:51 +0100 Received: from vax.ox.ac.uk by oxmail2 with SMTP (PP); Wed, 4 Oct 1995 18:15:36 +0100 Received: from 163.1.85.1 by vax.ox.ac.uk (MX V4.1 VAX) with SMTP; Wed, 04 Oct 1995 18:15:31 +0100 X-Sender: MELLIS@vax.ox.ac.uk Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 18:20:01 +0100 To: sc22wg5 From: Miles.Ellis@Educational-Technology-Resources-Centre.oxford.ac.uk (Miles Ellis) Subject: Fortran 95 Registration and CD ballots I have received a set of comments from the SC22 Secretariat, together with the votes at the close of the ballot period. (He usually waits for a few days before sending out the official result because there are usually some votes that arrive late due to postal, or other, delays) The following figures are, therefore, unofficial: On the ballot to register the document as a CD: 15 YES 5 NOT VOTING On the ballot to approve the CD: 10 YES 4 YES with comments (France, Germany, Japan, UK) 1 NO (USA) 5 NOT VOTING The USA submitted 20 "minor technical changes that should be made before Fortran 95 proceeds to DIS status, together with about twelve pages of recommended "quality improvements" of a minor technical nature and "editorial improvements" of a strictly editorial nature. France submitted one general comment and two editorial comments. Germany submitted four pages of "mainly editorial" comments. Japan submitten 11 "minor Editorial" comments. The UK submitted 6 technical comments and 14 editorial comments. The CD has therefore passed its approval ballot, but it is important that the 20 issues identified by the USA as its reason for a NO vote are discussed and dealt with in San Diego, as well as the 150-200 editorial comments submitted by the five countries detailed above (Many of these may identify the same item, of course; I have not yet had time to check. Before the document can be submitted for DIS processing there must be a complete "disposition of comments" document. I will send a further message later this week detailing how I shall distribute these comments which exist, at present, only in paper form. Miles ======================================================================= Dr Miles Ellis CCCCCCCCCCC Director: Educational Technology Resources Centre C C University of Oxford, 37-41 Wellington Square C E Oxford OX1 2JF, ENGLAND C T C R Telephone: +44 1865 270528 Fax: +44 1865 270527 C C Email: Miles.Ellis@etrc.ox.ac.uk CCCCCCCCCCC =======================================================================