From janshep@watson.ibm.com Tue Jun 13 11:42:39 1995 Received: from watson.ibm.com by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA05505 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for ); Wed, 14 Jun 1995 00:34:01 +0200 Message-Id: <199506132234.AA05505@dkuug.dk> Received: from YKTVMV by watson.ibm.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with BSMTP id 0983; Tue, 13 Jun 95 18:33:24 EDT Date: Tue, 13 Jun 95 15:42:39 EDT From: "J.C. Shepherd" X-Addr: Research, Yorktown To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Subject: 006 post-meeting 133 x3j3 letter ballot X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 While this is an X3J3 letter ballot, comments from non-X3J3 members are most welcome. Mallory: please include the following in the premeeting for meeting 134. Thanks. Janice -------------------------------------------------------------------- To:X3J3 From: Janice Shepherd Subject: 006 post-meeting 133 letter ballot This is the 006 post-meeting 133 letter ballot. Rich Bleikamp kindly prepared the ballot for me. This ballot is being conducted by email. No hardcopy will be mailed. Please respond by e-mail. If you are unable to respond by e-mail please contact me (Janice Shepherd (1-914-784-6313)). Please let me know if you have any concerns about the ballot. The ballot will end at midnight July 13th. This summary of interpretation processing at meeting 133 was provided by Graham. Graham and Larry provided the electronic text for the 006 items. Thanks guys. Paper Interp Decision 95-162 000101 - Move to 95-008 (Fortran 2000) (Passed U.C.) 95-139 000127 - Draft Response (Passed U.C.) 95-142r1 000148 - Draft Response (Passed 10-2) 95-141 000158 - Draft Response (Passed U.C.) 95-144 000173 - Draft Response (Passed U.C.) 95-155 000176 - Draft Response (Passed 12-1) 95-160 000186 - Draft Response (Passed U.C.) 95-097 000193 - Draft Response (Passed U.C.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The text of the defect items was sent out separately. Let me know if you did not receive the items. Please do NOT return the text of the defect items when voting. If you want to make a comment about an interpretation (you must make a comment if you are voting No) please put the comment in the following format: number vote lastname Comment text .... more comment .... eg. 0 Y Bleikamp I really like these edits! This format makes it easier for me to sort the comments by interpretation number. You do not have to use the ballot form listed below to indicate your vote. Sending me a note indicating "I vote yes without comments on all items except for the following ..." is an acceptable form of voting. Other forms of voting are fine too, as long as I can understand your vote. Janice Shepherd/voice: (914) 784-6313 fax: (914) 784-6306 To reply by email mail to janshep@watson.ibm.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y|wc N 95-006 Item |_|_| |_| 000101 Specification statements |_|_| |_| 000127 Is a module a global entity? |_|_| |_| 000148 RANDOM_SEED, RANDOM_NUMBER |_|_| |_| 000158 Leftmost (on a line) negative integer |_|_| |_| 000173 Definition of elemental intrinsic subroutine |_|_| |_| 000176 Definition of RANDOM_SEED |_|_| |_| 000186 Allowed values of POSITION= and STATUS= specifiers when changing BLANK= |_|_| |_| 000193 Pointer actual arguments with the OPTIONAL attribute