From eeccee@mixcom.com Thu Mar 2 ,:08:52 1995 Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA05750 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for ); Fri, 3 Mar 1995 14:43:53 +0100 Received: by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.10/2.2) id NAA04911; Fri, 3 Mar 1995 13:40:53 GMT Message-Id: <199503031340.NAA04911@mixcom.mixcom.com> Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.743) Re: Interoperability To: Keith.Bierman@eng.sun.com Date: Fri, 3 Mar 1995 07:40:52 -40975532 (CST) From: "Craig Dedo" Cc: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk (WG5 Mailing List) In-Reply-To: <199503022149.AA12501@dkuug.dk> from "Keith.Bierman@eng.sun.com" at Mar 2, 95 01:47:33 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 735 X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 > I neglected to mention in my previous missive that some common (GUIish > stuff) has names longer than 31 characters, another reason for some > sort of external to Fortran mechanism. > Perhaps (NOT definitely) we should take another look at what the maximum length of symbolic names should be in Fortran. sincerely, -- Craig T. Dedo Internet: Craig.Dedo@mixcom.com Elmbrook Computer Services Voice Phone: (414) 783-5869 17130 W. Burleigh Place Brookfield, WI 53005 Disclaimer: These opinions are mine alone. USA They do NOT represent any organization. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin