From ljm@slac.stanford.edu Thu Mar  2 07:03:55 1995
Received: from SCSW6.SLAC.Stanford.EDU by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA14661
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>); Fri, 3 Mar 1995 00:02:31 +0100
Received: from [134.79.128.74] (MOZART.SLAC.Stanford.EDU)
 by SCSW6.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (PMDF V4.3-10 #6987)
 id <01HNNXRWEBY8001NZB@SCSW6.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>; Thu,
 02 Mar 1995 15:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 1995 15:03:55 -0800
From: ljm@slac.stanford.edu (Leonard J. Moss)
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.743) Re: Interoperability
X-Sender: ljm@popserv
To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
Message-Id: <v01510100ab7bfd37b311@[134.79.128.74]>
X-Envelope-To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

>I neglected to mention in my previous missive that some common (GUIish
>stuff) has names longer than 31 characters, another reason for some
>sort of external to Fortran mechanism.

Perhaps we need a quick mod to F95 to accomodate longer names?  I would
think that's a small enough edit it could be agreed at the WG5 meeting and
changed in the document in time for the CD ballot (that is, providing
people can agree on how long is long enough ;-).

--
Leonard J. Moss <ljm@slac.stanford.edu>  | My views don't necessarily
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center       | reflect those of SLAC,
MS 97; P.O. Box 4349; Stanford, CA 94309 | Stanford or the DOE


