From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom9=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sat May 17 03:24:14 2025 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom9 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom9@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 9C6E1356A3A; Sat, 17 May 2025 03:24:14 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from www975.sakura.ne.jp (www975.sakura.ne.jp [219.94.128.215]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3D035698D for ; Sat, 17 May 2025 03:24:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www975.sakura.ne.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www975.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 54H1O5gJ010392 for ; Sat, 17 May 2025 10:24:05 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from malcolm@nag-j.co.jp) Received: from Maru10 (218-42-159-105.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by www975.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 54H1O4ar010388 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 17 May 2025 10:24:05 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from malcolm@nag-j.co.jp) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=sniiyxsooZCuXiBvzyrXM5LbBYEWEN8yh0zAk2ZNGMw=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nag-j.co.jp; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID; s=rs20250417; t=1747445045; v=1; b=I3+KLdoHOoriZ4oD4mvUpLL3lAyfjfOU8HRz/WO4ervnnb2pbmWLDczASdXVmJz5 idWyHzG6o8I91SuGhou0Qz3xLH1JXTtx0CZ7nXuLtiIqdWYhyEnbDV23RVigYjny gcT3WXDpyGrM2cuVL3UPNwpswocEDDDPACSlet5AMGdYF7Q5+JWlu/4IfN5K4ybC AZErqJc721R/ze9qaZmK/PMBXpmjausSDoqyABbc8YO8dNCIVC0yqmD4rREB21+v oTv4f9GxCE4mKBc792w2cqgOdotDPRzmBgXDp4t5Dg/Am0LBgNv+7DV8eFOqWhce niZ1W7DhoVsOXD4irFIi7g== From: "Malcolm Cohen" To: "'sc22wg5'" References: <20250516031346.9D36B3569C3@www.open-std.org> <4f8e57e8606a22547d527de90c4c932236c20927.camel@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <4f8e57e8606a22547d527de90c4c932236c20927.camel@sbcglobal.net> Subject: RE: [J3] [SC22WG5.6687] WG5 letter ballot 1 on Fortran 2023 interpretations Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 10:24:04 +0900 Message-ID: <007801dbc6ca$617802b0$24680810$@nag-j.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0079_01DBC715.D1648CB0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQH+zYuuds+oeQUeFNHKoxzeTToQlQHUw+Fas4FSd9A= Content-Language: ja X-Virus-Status: clean X-Anti-Virus-Server: fsav302.rs.sakura.ne.jp Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0079_01DBC715.D1648CB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Forwarding Van=E2=80=99s unofficial vote to the WG5 list for him. =20 Perhaps I should have written: =20 1. J3 list members *please* remember to set the reply to the WG5 list, = as the J3 list server makes =E2=80=9Creply=E2=80=9D go only to the J3 = list (I will see it but some WG5 members may not). The J3 list is a = subset of the WG5 list so please don=E2=80=99t send to both J3 and WG5! 2. As usual, unofficial votes and comments from people who are not = technically members of WG5 are always welcome, and will be included in = the results. =20 Cheers, --=20 ..............Malcolm Cohen, NAG Oxford/Tokyo. =20 From: J3 On Behalf Of Van Snyder via = J3 Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2025 5:22 AM To: j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org Cc: Van Snyder Subject: Re: [J3] [SC22WG5.6687] WG5 letter ballot 1 on Fortran 2023 = interpretations =20 On Fri, 2025-05-16 at 11:26 +0900, Malcolm Cohen via J3 wrote: The following Fortran 2023 interpretations are being balloted: =20 I'm emeritus so I don't get an official vote, but here is my opinion, = for what it's worth. =20 =20 Yes No Number Title =20 -C- --- F23/003 Conflicting rules for COMMON block names =20 I can't understand a prohibition against a constant having the same name = as a common block, but an interp is not the right place to undo that F77 = decision. =20 -Y- --- F23/004 OUT_OF_RANGE and ROUND argument -Y- --- F23/005 Defined assignment/operators and dynamic type -Y- --- F23/006 Underflow in IEEE_SCALB -Y- --- F23/008 Real argument I in IEEE_SCALB -Y- --- F23/009 Coarray subobject of component -Y- --- F23/010 MOVE_ALLOC with coarray arguments -Y- --- F23/011 NULL and procedure pointers -Y- --- F23/012 Coarray correspondence in DEALLOCATE -Y- --- F23/013 BOZ literals in interoperable enumerators -Y- --- F23/015 Coindexed objects in structure constructors -Y- --- F23/016 Segments associated with allocation -Y- --- F23/017 CFI_establish nonalloc nonpointer null base address -Y- --- F23/018 Correspondence of unallocated coarrays =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0079_01DBC715.D1648CB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Forwarding = Van=E2=80=99s unofficial vote to the WG5 list for = him.

 

Perhaps I = should have written:

 

  1. J3 list = members *please* remember to set the reply to the WG5 list, as = the J3 list server makes =E2=80=9Creply=E2=80=9D go only to the J3 list = (I will see it but some WG5 members may not). The J3 list is a subset of = the WG5 list so please don=E2=80=99t send to both J3 and = WG5!
  2. As usual, = unofficial votes and comments from people who are not technically = members of WG5 are always welcome, and will be included in the = results.

 

Cheers,<= /o:p>

-- =

.............= .Malcolm Cohen, NAG Oxford/Tokyo.

 

From:<= /b> J3 = <j3-bounces@mailman.j3-fortran.org> On Behalf Of Van Snyder = via J3
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2025 5:22 AM
To: = j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org
Cc: Van Snyder = <van.snyder@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [J3] = [SC22WG5.6687] WG5 letter ballot 1 on Fortran 2023 = interpretations

 

On Fri, = 2025-05-16 at 11:26 +0900, Malcolm Cohen via J3 = wrote:

The following Fortran 2023 interpretations = are being balloted:

 

I'm emeritus so I don't get an official vote, but here = is my opinion, for what it's worth.

 

 

Yes  No   = Number    Title

 

-C-  ---  F23/003  Conflicting = rules for COMMON block names

 

I = can't understand a prohibition against a constant having the same name = as a common block, but an interp is not the right place to undo that F77 = decision.

 

-Y-  ---  F23/004  = OUT_OF_RANGE and ROUND argument

-Y-  ---  F23/005  Defined = assignment/operators and dynamic type

-Y-  ---  F23/006  Underflow = in IEEE_SCALB

-Y-  ---  F23/008  Real = argument I in IEEE_SCALB

-Y-  ---  F23/009  Coarray = subobject of component

-Y-  ---  F23/010  MOVE_ALLOC = with coarray arguments

-Y-  ---  F23/011  NULL and = procedure pointers

-Y-  ---  F23/012  Coarray = correspondence in DEALLOCATE

-Y-  ---  F23/013  BOZ = literals in interoperable enumerators

-Y-  ---  F23/015  Coindexed = objects in structure constructors

-Y-  ---  F23/016  Segments = associated with allocation

-Y-  ---  F23/017  = CFI_establish nonalloc nonpointer null base = address

-Y-  ---  F23/018  = Correspondence of unallocated = coarrays

 

------=_NextPart_000_0079_01DBC715.D1648CB0--