From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Wed Jun  8 22:33:12 2005
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo1
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo1@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 3E65211555; Wed,  8 Jun 2005 22:33:12 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E152D11431
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed,  8 Jun 2005 22:33:05 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j58KWHwE016703
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from dick.hendrickson@att.net)
Received: from 204.127.135.43 ([204.127.135.43])
          by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP
          id <2005060820282911100o6uvae>; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:28:29 +0000
Received: from [68.165.44.16] by 204.127.135.43;
	Wed, 08 Jun 2005 20:28:28 +0000
From: dick.hendrickson@att.net
To: van.snyder@jpl.nasa.gov, sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
Subject: Re: (j3.2005) (SC22WG5.3290) What rank > 7 did WG5 choose at Delft?
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 20:28:28 +0000
Message-Id: <060820052028.7673.42A754EC0006403100001DF9215876675502019C050C079D0B020A08D2050C070B@att.net>
X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Feb 14 2005)
X-Authenticated-Sender: ZGljay5oZW5kcmlja3NvbkBhdHQubmV0
X-Spam-Score: 0.339 () NO_REAL_NAME
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk


 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Van Snyder <van.snyder@jpl.nasa.gov>
> WG5 put J3-039 (Rank > 7) onto the "required" list at Delft.  The
> resolutions don't indicate a revision of the proposal in N1626, but I do
> remember straw votes about the new rank limit.  I don't see it in my
> notes, however.  Does anybody have notes about it?
> 

Yes.  

My notes show two straw votes.

1)  what's an acceptable rank amongst  7, 10, 15, 20, 31?
I believe more than one vote was allowed.
  7   10   15   20   31       acceptable rank
  8   10   15    4    4       vote

2)  Should we combine corank with rank in the limit
Yes, Rank + corank <= 15         14
No,  Rank <= 15; corank ???       2
No                                1
Undec                             4

And I have a note that says "modify j3-039 for rank + corank <= 15

Dick Hendrickson
