From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Wed Jun  8 15:22:13 2005
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo1
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo1@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 3CEC11146C; Wed,  8 Jun 2005 15:22:13 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2451130A
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed,  8 Jun 2005 15:22:07 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from balin.rl.ac.uk (balin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.155])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j58DLGwE012284
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:21:19 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk)
X-RAL-MFrom: <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
X-RAL-Connect: <jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]>
Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202])
	by balin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j58Cxq7H011733;
	Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:59:52 +0100
Received: from rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j58CxuJ4008276;
	Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:59:57 +0100
Message-ID: <42A6EBCC.7040006@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:59:56 +0100
From: John Reid <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk
Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3) Gecko/20041005
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
Subject: SC22WG5 whitelist
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
X-Spam-Score: 0 () 
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk


From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
Subject: SC22WG5 whitelist
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:12:35 +0100
To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622)
X-Spam-Score: 0 ()

Unfortunately the whitelist filtering mechanism on the SC22WG5 mailing
list appears not to be working properly and a number of spurious
messages are getting through to list members.  This is being
investigated and I can only apologize for the nuisance meanwhile.

The problem does not directly affect members of the j3 and ukfortran
sub-lists, which have their own whitelists.

David