From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Sun May 22 13:38:34 2005
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo1
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo1@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 4B192112FF; Sun, 22 May 2005 13:38:34 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C2A112DF
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Sun, 22 May 2005 13:38:28 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from mail525.nifty.com (mail525.nifty.com [202.248.37.142])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j4M9WIwE008495
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Sun, 22 May 2005 11:32:26 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from takata@edogawa-u.ac.jp)
Received: from mail502.nifty.com (mail502p.nifty.com [172.22.54.106])by mail525.nifty.com with ESMTP id j4M9R1Hd012283
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Sun, 22 May 2005 18:27:01 +0900
Received: from takata-n9.edogawa-u.ac.jp (nfmvno002003169.dd.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp [220.147.100.169]) (authenticated)
	by mail502.nifty.com with ESMTP id j4M9QUwr008096
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Sun, 22 May 2005 18:26:33 +0900
Authentication-Results: mail502.nifty.com from=takata@edogawa-u.ac.jp; sender-id=neutral; spf=neutral
Message-Id: <5.1.1.11.2.20050522182016.00ccb510@mail.edogawa-u.ac.jp>
X-Sender: gaf01617@mail.edogawa-u.ac.jp (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1J Jr5-rev2
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 18:26:31 +0900
To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
From: TAKATA Masayuki <takata@edogawa-u.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.3271) Format of WG5 meetings
In-Reply-To: <20050517102518.14FF6112DD@open-std.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0 () 
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

John and Dan,

At 05/05/17 09:26 +0100, John Reid wrote:
> The prompts Dan and I to ask whether to do the same for future joint J3/WG5 
> meetings. In particular, I would like to take a straw vote on what to do for the 
> meeting in February.

I didn't vote, because I have no class in February, with an exception of the 
first week.  In many other months, however, I have Monday classes, and a full-
day-on-Friday meeting kills me very badly.  Yes, I realized it, this week!

So, if you ask about future joint meetings in general, I would say: 

> 1. I prefer to start on Sunday and finish mid-morning on Friday.

This is not the case if the meeting is planned for a week just before one of 
my off Mondays.  

Regards,
Makki

-- 
(Mr) Takata, Masayuki: Professor
Edogawa University, Nagareyama, Chiba 270-0198 Japan
phone:+81-4-7152-0661ext546   fax:+81-4-7154-2490
http://www.edogawa-u.ac.jp/~takata/

