From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Fri May 20 17:08:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo1 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo1@open-std.org Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id CEFF311467; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:08:28 +0200 (CET DST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66]) by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9240FF8AA for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:08:26 +0200 (CET DST) Received: from balin.rl.ac.uk (balin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.155]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j4KD2SwE075870 for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 15:02:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk) X-RAL-MFrom: X-RAL-Connect: Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]) by balin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4KD2F7H009529; Fri, 20 May 2005 14:02:15 +0100 Received: from rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4KDA3J4000559; Fri, 20 May 2005 14:10:03 +0100 Message-ID: <428DE1AB.2010403@rl.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 14:10:03 +0100 From: John Reid Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3) Gecko/20041005 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Re: Format of WG5 meetings References: <4289AACF.8060804@rl.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <4289AACF.8060804@rl.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk John Reid wrote: > WG5, > > We were forced by the availability of our meeting room to hold the Delft > meeting as five full days from Monday. I was very impressed by the > willingness of everyone to continue working right up to 6 p.m. > > The prompts Dan and I to ask whether to do the same for future joint > J3/WG5 meetings. In particular, I would like to take a straw vote on > what to do for the meeting in February. Should we start with a full day > on Sunday and finish mid-morning on Friday or should we start on Monday > and work a full day (8-5) on Friday? > > Since I will be at a meeting in the US next week and will not be reading > email, please vote by noon on Friday (UK time). Please do not vote > unless you are reasonably likely to attend. > > Please choose one option: > > 1. I prefer to start on Sunday and finish mid-morning on Friday. > > 2. I do not mind. > > 3. I prefer to start on Monday and meet for a full day on Friday. > > If you have a strong reason for choosing 1 or 3, please say so. The straw vote is closed and it is not a lot of help - 5:2:5. Everyone said that they could accept either schedule. So let's leave it to the local host to do what suits him best (that is, after all, what we did in Delft). Cheers, John.