From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Wed Dec 8 02:28:58 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo1 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo1@open-std.org Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id B770A12E34; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:28:58 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66]) by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EE35FC for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:28:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail526.nifty.com (mail526.nifty.com [202.248.37.143]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id iB81QEjH019457 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:26:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from takata@edogawa-u.ac.jp) Received: from mail500.nifty.com (mail500p.nifty.com [172.22.54.104])by mail526.nifty.com with ESMTP id iB81NfTl026112 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:23:45 +0900 Received: from takata-n9.edogawa-u.ac.jp (nfmvno002003063.dd.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp [220.147.100.63]) (authenticated) by mail500.nifty.com with ESMTP id iB81NFkk023012 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:23:17 +0900 Message-Id: <5.1.1.11.2.20041208100231.057dc060@mail.edogawa-u.ac.jp> X-Sender: gaf01617@mail.edogawa-u.ac.jp (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1-Jr5 Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:23:14 +0900 To: WG5 From: TAKATA Masayuki Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.3186) (j3.2004) F2003 has been published In-Reply-To: <20041208003600.0626B1ED53@open-std.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk John, congratulations for getting the number (j3.2004)! :-) At 04/12/07 23:52 +0000, Jeanne-Martin@comcast.net wrote: > According to their naming, it is the second - the second 1539-1. Fortran 95 > was the first 1539-1. Fortran 77 and Fortran 90 were first and second editions > of 1539 [ without the -1]. I have ISO copies of F90 and F95 to verify this. An opposite example is ISO/IEC 10646:2003. Here is an excerpt from its foreword: > This first edition of ISO/IEC 10646 cancels and replaces ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000 > and ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001. It also incorporates ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000/Amd.1:2002. I found this just recently. Regards, Makki -- (Mr) Takata, Masayuki: Associate Professor Edogawa University, Nagareyama, Chiba 270-0198 Japan phone:+81-4-7152-0661ext546 fax:+81-4-7154-2490 http://www.edogawa-u.ac.jp/~takata/