From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Wed Dec  8 01:35:59 2004
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-domo1
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-domo1@open-std.org
Received: by open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 598411ED55; Wed,  8 Dec 2004 01:35:59 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from dkuug.dk (ptah.dkuug.dk [195.215.30.66])
	by open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F407572A
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed,  8 Dec 2004 01:35:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id iB80UjjH017867
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 01:33:03 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from Jeanne-Martin@comcast.net)
Received: from 204.127.205.148 ([204.127.205.148])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP
          id <20041207235224011000debve>; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:52:25 +0000
Received: from [67.164.81.83] by 204.127.205.148;
	Tue, 07 Dec 2004 23:52:24 +0000
From: Jeanne-Martin@comcast.net
To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk, WG5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
Cc: John Reid <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>, COMP-FORTRAN-90@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: (j3.2004) (SC22WG5.3184) F2003 has been published
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 23:52:24 +0000
Message-Id: <120720042352.4545.41B6423800069F6C000011C1220073544602079B9D0EB3D30A02020E0AB6@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Nov 22 2004)
X-Authenticated-Sender: SmVhbm5lLU1hcnRpbkBjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.339 () NO_REAL_NAME
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk





> I am not willing to pay CHF 340, so I cannot look at it and tell you whether our 
> (very minor) edits were incorporated. My guess is not, since they say it is the 
> second edition and one of our changes was to point out that it is the fourth.

According to their naming, it is the second - the second 1539-1.  Fortran 95
was the first 1539-1.  Fortran 77 and Fortran 90 were first and second editions
of 1539  [ without the -1].  I have ISO copies of F90 and F95 to verify this.
> 
> The failure to communicate with me or Richard Maine is extremely annoying. Many 
> thanks, David, for telling me about it.

