Disposition of comments on JTC1 N 4246Rev Paragraph 1 UK Comments deferred. US comments accomodated Directives to be Italicized Paragraph 2 Resolution to the Italian comment B4537 New DIS balloting procedures will determine the document form to be used is a matter between the NB and the ITTF and beyond the scope of this policy. However, based upon experience, if the final text is then distributed, PDF is the recommended format. Paragraph 4.1 Delete reference to TTCN Resolution to the Italian comments #4537 New DIS balloting procedures will determine the document form to be used is a matter between the NB and the ITTF and beyond the scope of this policy. However, based upon experience,if the final text is then distributed, PDF is the recommended format. Resolution the the comments on TTCN Add new para to the end of 4.1 It is recognized that in certain cases, standards documents may be prepared which utilize other formats to provide machine readable content. Specific approval to use such formats, in a normative manner, should be sought by the appropriate SC (e.g. for the use of Machine Processable (Table and Tree Combined Notation (TTCN))) and such approval, if granted does not remove the need to provide a copy for distribution of the human readable content in one of the formats above. On US COMMENTS: Do not upgrade to Word 6.0. No agreement to eliminate RTF. List is not intended to indicate priority. Paragraph 4.2 French comments on graphics (4526) Para 4.2 If the document contains other than simple graphics as described above (and is being circulated in revisable form for comment), the graphics should be circulated as a separate file(s) in the directory. SC 1 Comments A sub-committee can choose which format to use 1. TTCN comment. Accommodated (See revision). 2. The policy covers many forms of distribution, some of which, e-mail with attachments is the most appropriate means. When using e-mail with attachments encoding of binary files (e.g. Word and WP documents) is necessary) and desirable for RTF (See "Tips and Techniques"). Para 4.3 Templates UK Comments - (Table in N4208 + "Read Me File") accomodated within purview of ad hoc. Remainder of comment is responsibility of ISO Central Secretariat. (leave Templates as stand-alone documents. Request Secretariat to re-issue with cover page instructing SC's to use the templates in the preparation of documents + Add ASCII version. 4028 Templates _ Reissue Read Me File detail _ policy Document Types _ policy 4321 Recommendation _ JTC1 Secretariat re-issue document N4028 Annex A SC 29 Comments electronic version vs. Printed copy a. existing para 2 "committees shall¼" b. existing para 1 "Annex A ¼ " add Wider margins are better add Minimum Margins ¼ A4 Left 20 add (The binding margin for double-sided documents.) Right 10 add (The opposite-from-binding margin for double-sided documents) add (This document has margins more generous than the above margins.) add Minimum Margins ¼ NA page] Left 20 add (as above) Right 10 add (as above)